![]() |
| Real 3D Glasses for 3D Movies by Razlan |
Not too long ago 3D was hailed as the “new cinema” and the way of the future for film. Billions of dollars (and pounds) were invested into producing, marketing, and distributing 3D films. With the success of Avatar in particular, Hollywood believed 3D would be the best way forward for the industry and a re-birth of the big blockbuster film. It seems that most of Hollywood’s funding has gone directly to effects-heavy 3D films (adaptations and remakes especially) rather than nurturing interesting, original 2D films. Unfortunately for Hollywood and cinema goers, it seems they were wrong. The opposite is true. 3D is not the future of cinema; in fact it is very quickly ruining cinema.
The film industry is losing money. The proportion of profits made from 3D screenings and ticket sales of the big summer films as opposed to 2D screening sales has dropped from 80% to 39% in just 18 months. Many in the film industry and those who enjoy watching films firmly believe that 3D is ruining film. And yet the cinemas still offer more 3D showings than 2D (2D films are regularly sold out while 3D films are half empty). It’s not just the cost. We like good quality old fashioned 2D films. In fact, we like ‘em better!
There have been many problems associated with 3D beyond just the basic frustrations of higher ticket cost at the cinema:
- Those Damn Hipster Glasses! People who wear prescription glasses find 3D very uncomfortable due to having to wear a second pair of glasses over their own. This causes frustration and immediately separates you from the cinema experience by making you less relaxed and less likely to connect with your film. But it’s not just us glasses wearing folk who are annoyed by the glasses. The glasses aren’t comfortable, they look silly, and they are an added cost on top of an already inflated ticket price! Grr!
- Did Somebody Turn Out the Lights? 3D films are darker and less clear than their 2D counterparts. The edges of the picture seem to fade to shadow as if we’re watching someone’s not so clear memory rather than a vibrant cinematic story. It makes all the hard work of the cinematographer and technical team for nothing. 3D films are seriously lacking on colour, light, and vitality. I know it’s not the film itself because the 2D versions are lit just fine and are as vibrant as ever. Having to pay more for 3D only to not be able to see the film as well is just not cool.
- Story? What Story? In general 3D films are more concerned about flash, effects, and gimmicks than they are about actual story. 3D films are evidence of Hollywood losing its heart and I think its mind a little bit too. It seems most big Producers and Execs have forgotten that people go to the cinema to be entertained and told a good story not just to watch flashy effects and kaleidoscope imagery. Remember the good old days when cinema actually consistently told interesting, quality, original stories that were NOT predictable, overdone, or cliché? I miss those days.
- Effects! Effects! Effects! I’m beginning to wonder if actors in 3D films actually remember how to, you know, act. It’s all about big 3D climaxes and pop out effects rather than true emotional character development and a satisfying journey. The pop outs are the only gimmick 3D has ever been really good at – it’s now officially boring.
- The Health Problems: It’s not surprising really but 3D cinema and effects can lead to health problems. This isn’t just limited to 3D cinema either. It’s 3D in general. 3D computer and gaming screens have the same effect. 3D can cause visual discomfort, fatigue, and headaches. Despite what some 3D enthusiasts may tell you, discomfort associated with 3D is a major concern. However, some vision experts have seen a bit of merit to 3D cinema as it can draw attention to eye problems. If you do decide to subject yourself to a 3D film (or someone else makes you), pay attention to how it affects you: if you feel dizzy, the image is blurry, or you can’t see the 3D effect at all it may point to a serious eye condition – go see your optometrist!
The problems with 3D are numerous. Yet many 3D films are still being released over 2D films.
Is Hollywood destroying itself by throwing almost all of its apples into one 3D basket? Yes and somewhat no. When 3D cinema is done right (which happens rarely) it can add to the experience. Avatar did a great job of producing a phenomenal effect of depth, truly drawing us into the fictional world; however the glasses, cost, and vibrancy issues were still a problem even for Avatar. The 3D effect did not make the film. I enjoyed it more in 2D.
I love cinema. I want to see it go on and continue to produce amazing, quality stories that move, excite, and inspire me and all cinema goers. I also would love to see original content by new writers not just adaptations and remakes, but that’s another story for another day. So is Hollywood’s 3D Vision Waning? God I hope so.
If you dislike 3D films as much as I do, then contact your local cinemas. Have your say! Spread the word and make your opinion known! More voices make a louder impact.
See you at the 2D showing…
This is a guest post by K Newey. She loves 2D cinema and enjoys wearing a great pair of glasses. She is from Canada but lives in the south of England with her husband, who also wears glasses. They regularly go to the cinema but avoid 3D (and 3D glasses) as much as possible.
















